Is there a biblical case for Trump (part III of III)
Voting for freedom rather than a “fighter” allows Christians to stay consistent in their faith and politics. Tune into Fox News any night, and you’ll
– Pursuing intellectual honesty in politics –
Voting for freedom rather than a “fighter” allows Christians to stay consistent in their faith and politics. Tune into Fox News any night, and you’ll
(This essay was adapted for the Oklahoman on September 30, 2024) In June, Superintendent Ryan Walters issued a memo requiring the Bible be taught in
“…but what about abortion?” Some Christians agree with my assessment that Donald Trump is an unsuitable candidate for Christians to support, but they feel compelled
January 23, 2024 – Following wins in the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries, Donald Trump again secured his status as the likely republican nominee for
Republican opposition to gun control is not conservative.
The republican response to the global pandemic has run contrary to the conservative principles that supposedly underpin our political philosophy.
If Republicans want their ideas to resonate with voters and secure lasting majorities in Congress, they should borrow a page from the Argonaut’s playbook
The most enduring laws stem from bipartisan support that only the filibuster can facilitate. Without it, nothing in federal law would ever be settled. The laws created under the filibuster’s chaperone may not be ideologically pure, but that sort of imperfect progress is exactly what the country needs.
The Senate has its problems, but what if the answers are harder to find than crafting a clever policy solution? What if it demands something from us, the electorate?
Congress must reform ‘qualified immunity’ to ensure those who enforce the law are also subject to it and to restore Congress as the rightful and representative author of our nation’s laws.
The power of words spoken boldly to reluctant listeners is compelling. The ‘informing function’ is a powerful feature that Congress – and Senate Republicans in particular – should use to lead the national conversation and guide the country towards reconciliation.
The aim of political commentary is persuasion, and it can provide loads of insight. But it requires an audience. So how do we choose what we read and why does it matter?
Can we trust our institutions? Are concerns with a ‘deep state’ valid? The nature of most federal jobs is apolitical. But the answer to federal overreach and even rogue actors is a better Congress. And it’s up to voters to make that a reality.
Support for President Trump by some of the Evangelical Christian community’s most well-known leaders has crossed a concerning threshold. Christian pastors must respond.
This 2nd annual book review list is especially short as #DadLife has taken over. But to supplement your reading experience, I’ve given Kevin the Beagle a cameo in the above picture, though he read nothing in 2019.
Senate majorities should exercise restraint from further weakening the filibuster. This procedural tool is the very embodiment of the Senate’s values that gives voice to minorities and encourages consensus as well as more civil political discourse.
Here’s an unpopular opinion for you: Members of Congress should spend more time in Washington. Otherwise we effectively prioritize polarization over progress.
This is the first in a three-part series examining ways to improve Congress.
Term limits won’t fix what we dislike about career politicians, but voters can. To improve the quality of our leaders, voters should exercise greater discretion at the ballot box. Our democratic process already requires regularly scheduled elections that can overturn regrettable votes. But imposing time limitations on Members of Congress only prevents exceptional leadership from emerging without promising that new politicians will be any better.
I love seeing which books made an impact on people. This year I’m sharing my own reading list along with a few comments/quotes. Interested to hear what you read as well.
On balance, Judge Kavanaugh – though well credentialed and impressive in several respects – failed to demonstrate sober discretion both in his professional past and during the nomination hearings. The Supreme Court simply demands more.
We can avoid such contentious nominations in the future by putting more effort towards electing effective legislators rather than relying on the Supreme Court to fulfill our policy goals and by restoring the filibuster in the Senate.
Outdated ethanol policies failed to live up to their promise. Will new EPA leadership allow them to continue?
[Pictured above: The original Senate Subway takes Members and staff to and from the Capitol from the Russell Senate Office Building.]
The conflict inherent to our polarized public discourse is most often rooted in the means rather than the ends. Simply making this distinction should help cool our tempers. A mutually sincere interest in finding policy solutions for shared values should guide our debates.
With only two parties representing the melting pot of America, Congress can’t please everyone. Such is life in a democracy. But is the process by which outcomes are made fair? Or is the integrity of our democracy at risk?
David Brooks’ latest column is exceptional in its critique of the Republican Party, leading up to the Alabama Senate race between Roy Moore and Doug Jones. Three passages in particular are worth another look with minimal commentary from me.
The House and Senate take action on tax reform legislation. I view the bill as a net positive, but it’s far from perfect. Ultimately, voters need to improve the quality of our legislators to ensure better outcomes.
Tax reform is well underway in Washington. The House passed its plan last week, and the Senate aims to vote on another version after Thanksgiving.